Investock.ai, Stock Advisory Platform

Stock Advisory Platform Case Study

Back to projects

I turned a SEBI-registered research desk into something an investor could act on: advisory calls, model portfolios and theme baskets in one decision surface.

Scope of workWeb and Mobile Fintech
Timeline10 weeks
RoleLead Product Designer
Team1 PM, 3 Engineers, 1 Analyst

About Investock.ai

Investock.ai is a SEBI-registered research analyst (INH000026150). It publishes equity and F&O advisory calls carrying entry, target and stop-loss levels alongside the research behind them, runs curated model portfolios such as India Growth, and offers diversified theme baskets, while execution stays with the investor's own broker. This case study covers the onboarding, advisory and portfolio-evaluation flows.

investock.ai
Investock.ai: Stock Advisory Platform Case Study overview

The problem

Investock.ai published advisory calls, model portfolios and theme baskets at once, and asked every new subscriber to understand all three before they could usefully act on any one of them.

User pain

  • Investors were acting on unattributed tips with no entry, target or stop-loss.
  • The research rationale existed but sat far from the moment of the decision.
  • Nothing told a subscriber when a live call had stopped being valid.

Business pain

  • High-intent subscribers dropped before reaching a first actionable call.
  • SEBI registration was the real differentiator and read as a badge, not proof.
  • Support absorbed questions about which plan and which basket suited whom.

Product gap

  • Advisory calls, model portfolios and theme baskets shared no decision frame.
  • Risk was collected at onboarding and then never used to filter what an investor saw.
  • Market signals, screeners and advisory calls each produced a recommendation with no shared shape.
Investock.ai user flow diagram

What I owned

Owned

  • Onboarding: risk profile, plan payment, and the KYC gate ahead of advisory access
  • The advisory call card: levels, rationale, and its invalidation state
  • A portfolio view holding model portfolios and manually added holdings side by side
  • Basket listing, basket detail, and adding a basket into the portfolio's risk mix

Collaborated

  • Research desk on what a published call must carry to stay compliant
  • PM on plan tiering and which surface each subscription unlocks
  • Engineering on live NSE data refresh and state visibility

Out of scope

  • Order execution: investors place their own trades at their own broker, outside the product
  • Research methodology and the calls themselves
  • Pricing of the advisory plans

The results

32%

faster sign-up to first portfolio

-27%

drop-off in onboarding

+21 pp

higher portfolio clarity score

Subscribers could act on a call without leaving the reasoning behind it. Advisory, model portfolios and baskets read as one product, not three. A regulated research desk became legible enough to sell as a subscription.

The approach

I segmented onboarding by risk profile and instrument before touching a screen, so the product could reveal only the surface a given investor had actually come for.

01

Sat with the calls

Read three months of published advisory calls and the questions support kept getting about them.

02

Split the intents

Separated long-term basket investors from F&O traders before designing a single onboarding path.

03

Rebuilt the call

Made entry, target, stop-loss, and rationale one object instead of four separate places.

04

Held risk to the end

Carried the tier picked at onboarding through every basket, portfolio and holding view.

Before the pixels

The boxes-and-arrows stage. Each of these settled a question the finished screens no longer show you was ever open.

Investock.ai wireframe: Anatomy of an advisory call

Anatomy of an advisory call

Three layouts for the same call. The one that shipped keeps entry, target, stop-loss and the reasoning on a single surface. A stop-loss one tap away is a stop-loss nobody uses.

Investock.ai wireframe: Risk is asked once, and everything obeys it

Risk is asked once, and everything obeys it

Investock asks for a risk tier during onboarding and then has to honour it. Sketching that answer as a filter, rather than adding a second suitability screen later, is what keeps a subscriber out of baskets they have no business opening.

Investock.ai wireframe: A basket lands, and the risk mix moves

A basket lands, and the risk mix moves

Adding a basket is not a neutral act. It changes what the whole portfolio is running at. The sketch ends on that readout, measuring the tier the investor picked at the start against what they now actually hold.

The decisions

The calls that shaped the product, with what each one cost. Anything crossed out here was a real option at the time.

Decision 1: Risk-profiled onboarding

Every investor was routed the same way regardless of risk appetite or instrument.

Considered

  • Single flow
  • Risk-profiled branch
  • Skip onboarding

Chose

Risk-profiled onboarding tied to plan and basket eligibility

Gave up

Slightly longer onboarding architecture

On what evidence

Intent split between long-term basket investors and F&O traders

What happened

Drop-off reduced to 27%

Decision 2: Anatomy of an advisory call

Calls arrived as a symbol and a direction, the way SMS-blast services send them.

Considered

  • Symbol and direction only
  • Call card with levels and rationale
  • Research note as an attachment

Chose

Call card carrying entry, target, stop-loss and the reasoning inline

Gave up

A denser card, and more research content to keep current

On what evidence

Subscribers said they read the rationale before deciding

What happened

Sign-up to first portfolio 32% faster

Investock.ai: options considered for Decision 2: Anatomy of an advisory call

Decision 3: Reading a portfolio

Model portfolio and basket pages were analytics-rich and still opaque.

Considered

  • Raw analytics
  • Tiered insight cards
  • Report export

Chose

Tiered insight cards with plain-language summaries

Gave up

Increased content maintenance

On what evidence

Subscribers wanted an actionable summary before the deep charts

What happened

Clarity score improved by 21 points

The work

Risk-led onboarding routes each investor into a single workflow, every advisory call carries its levels and its rationale inline, and portfolio insight is expressed as a small set of interpreted signals rather than a full analytics surface handed over uninterpreted.

Advisory calls: Put entry, target and stop where the decision gets made.

Advisory calls

Put entry, target and stop where the decision gets made.

Portfolio: Make holding-level outcome quality visible at a glance.

Portfolio

Make holding-level outcome quality visible at a glance.

Profile and risk: Surface KYC and risk state before it blocks advisory access.

Profile and risk

Surface KYC and risk state before it blocks advisory access.

Mobile dashboard: Carry portfolio value and the day's actions into thumb reach.

Mobile dashboard

Carry portfolio value and the day's actions into thumb reach.

Advisory on mobile: Hold the same call structure legible at phone width.

Advisory on mobile

Hold the same call structure legible at phone width.

Targets, set up front

Sign-up to first live portfolio

Baseline 14.2 min

Target <10 min

Result 9.6 min

test cohort

Onboarding drop-off

Baseline 37%

Target <30%

Result 27%

beta release

Portfolio clarity score

Baseline 55%

Target 70%+

Result 76%

survey

Outcomes in detail

Sign-up to first live portfolio14.2 min → 9.6 min · -32%

Faster path to product value

Onboarding drop-off37% → 27% · -27%

Improved activation quality

Clarity score55% → 76% · +21 pp

Stronger decision confidence

Reflection

What worked

Putting entry, target and stop-loss on the call card removed most of the guesswork.

What to improve

Make a call's invalidation as loud as its entry. Subscribers notice one and miss the other.

Next experiment

Test basket risk bands as a filter over the advisory feed.

Next projectPortfolio
Algorooms
Algorooms
Web Strategy Platform9 weeks
Softly lit reading nook with a grey lounge chair and ottoman

Vinit Chaudhary

Vinit Chaudhary

I'll personally review your brief and get back to you within two hours.

Product Designer

Contact

I usually respond to all digital enquiries within 2 business hours.

Vinit Chaudhary

Let's Work Together.

Reach out today and let's craft designs that elevate your brand to the next level.

© 2026 Vinit Chaudhary. All rights reserved.