Copartner, Fintech Signals App

Fintech Signals App Case Study

Back to projects

I clarified the journey from research signal to action so users could move with more confidence and less confusion.

Scope of workMobile Finance App
Timeline7 weeks
RoleProduct Designer
Team1 PM, 2 Engineers

About Copartner

Copartner is a mobile finance app that delivers research ideas and buy/sell signals from vetted analysts on a subscription. This case study covers the path from receiving a signal to acting on it, the point at which users were losing confidence and calling support.

Copartner: Fintech Signals App Case Study overview

The problem

Copartner delivered good signals and then abandoned users at the hardest moment: knowing what to actually do with one, by when, and whether it was still valid.

User pain

  • Users saw signals but were unsure what action to take next.
  • Subscription value was not clear at decision moments.
  • Signal credibility context was scattered.

Business pain

  • Signal consumption did not convert to action reliably.
  • Support load increased around execution ambiguity.
  • Subscription intent dropped due to unclear payoff.

Product gap

  • No cohesive bridge between signal insight and action.
  • Trust indicators lacked clear prioritization.
  • CTAs were detached from risk context.
Copartner user flow diagram

What I owned

Owned

  • Product strategy, user flows, and information architecture
  • Wireframes, interaction model, and high-fidelity UI
  • Validation synthesis and iteration decisions
  • Developer handoff with behavior states and edge cases

Collaborated

  • PM on scope, sequencing, and KPI alignment
  • Engineering on technical feasibility and state visibility
  • Stakeholders on domain constraints and rollout priorities

Out of scope

  • Backend implementation and infrastructure changes
  • Pricing, growth campaigns, and sales operations
  • Post-launch paid acquisition strategy

The results

+24%

signal-to-action conversion

-32%

support questions about next steps

4.3/5

clarity score in validation

Users moved from signal insight to action with clearer confidence cues. Core action funnel became more deterministic and predictable. Reduced support load and improved paid intent quality.

The approach

I took the signal itself as the unit of the journey, notification through to a placed action, and traced where confidence leaked out of it.

01

Discover

Mapped user and business friction through interviews, workflow audits, and benchmark analysis.

02

Prioritize

Ranked opportunities by impact on activation, task success, and decision confidence.

03

Design

Built IA, interaction patterns, and high-fidelity solutions with clear state behavior.

04

Validate

Tested critical flows, measured drop-offs, and iterated before development handoff.

The decisions

The calls that shaped the product, with what each one cost. Anything crossed out here was a real option at the time.

Decision 1: Signal card model

Signal cards lacked clear decision structure.

Considered

  • Data-heavy card
  • Action-first card
  • Modal detail model

Chose

Action-first card with confidence and risk context

Gave up

Reduced visible secondary indicators

On what evidence

Users asked, "What should I do now?" repeatedly

What happened

Signal-to-action conversion improved by 24%

Decision 2: Subscription framing

Users could not evaluate premium value quickly.

Considered

  • Price-first upsell
  • Outcome-first framing
  • Delayed paywall

Chose

Outcome-first framing with real workflow examples

Gave up

More content required in paywall context

On what evidence

Interviews showed value uncertainty before price concern

What happened

Higher intent quality in paid funnel

Decision 3: Execution handoff

Users dropped while moving from signal to broker action.

Considered

  • External link handoff
  • Guided handoff
  • Broker-agnostic modal

Chose

Guided handoff with checklist and status cues

Gave up

Added one transition layer

On what evidence

Support logs showed confusion at handoff stage

What happened

Support questions reduced by 32%

The work

Every signal now carries its own next step and validity window on the card itself, so 'where do I act' stopped being something users had to ask a human.

Signal feed: Make action priority and confidence visible immediately.

Signal feed

Make action priority and confidence visible immediately.

Decision details: Provide enough context for confident buy/sell choice.

Decision details

Provide enough context for confident buy/sell choice.

Premium path: Tie subscription value to real decision outcomes.

Premium path

Tie subscription value to real decision outcomes.

Targets, set up front

Signal-to-action

Baseline 38%

Target 48%+

Result 47%

pilot cohort

Support ticket share

Baseline 22%

Target <17%

Result 15%

30-day window

Flow clarity score

Baseline 3.4/5

Target 4.0+

Result 4.3/5

usability survey

Outcomes in detail

Signal-to-action38% → 47% · +24%

More actionable behavior

Support ticket share22% → 15% · -32%

Lower ambiguity burden

Clarity score3.4/5 → 4.3/5 · +0.9

Higher trust and confidence

Reflection

What worked

Action-first signal cards reduced decision ambiguity immediately.

What to improve

Introduce personalized signal explanations by risk profile.

Next experiment

Test outcome previews before broker handoff for high-volatility markets.

Next projectPortfolio
ChartingHQ
ChartingHQ
Web Analytics Platform7 weeks
Softly lit reading nook with a grey lounge chair and ottoman

Vinit Chaudhary

Vinit Chaudhary

I'll personally review your brief and get back to you within two hours.

Product Designer

Contact

I usually respond to all digital enquiries within 2 business hours.

Vinit Chaudhary

Let's Work Together.

Reach out today and let's craft designs that elevate your brand to the next level.

© 2026 Vinit Chaudhary. All rights reserved.